Insurance - The Elephant in the Room in Professional Liability Mediation

         In the preparation for and participation in mediation, it is imperative that counsel, both for plaintiffs and defendants, be conscious of the critical role insurance has in resolving any liability matter.  Personal (e.g. auto, homeowners) and commercial (e.g. CGL, professional liability) insurance policies impose on the insurer the “duty to defend” any suit or claim under the policy.  Coextensive with this is the carrier’s right to control this defense.  This includes that the decision to settle rests exclusively with the carrier.

            The exceptions to this are professional liability policies (medical, legal).   These policies universally include a “consent to settle” clause, which provides that the carrier will not settle any suit or claim without the consent of the insured.  This often results in personal counsel for the insured participating in the mediation, even if insurance limits aren’t at play.  Policies differ on the treatment of a settlement that the carrier finds reasonable and warranted but to which the insured refuses to consent.  Some policies allow the carrier to settle without the insured’s consent, if it finds said consent to be “unreasonably” withheld.  There are also policies that provide that, if the insured refuses to consent to a settlement acceptable to the claimant and found reasonable by the carrier, the coverage going forward shall be limited to the amount of the proposed settlement and defense expenses incurred to that date. 

             Settlement of a professional liability matter has consequences for the defendant well beyond the depletion of his insurance policy limits and a damaged ego.  In the case of a healthcare provider, any such settlement must be reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB).  This is a Federal clearinghouse that maintains information, to a great extent negative information, on healthcare practitioners, including malpractice verdicts and settlements.  The NPDB is accessed whenever a practitioner applies for employment, credentials, preferred provider status, and professional liability insurance.  In addition, a report to the NPDB is, in turn, reported to the applicable state licensing authority.  In many states, including Washington, this triggers, at a minimum, a disciplinary investigation.  Any of these could result in a significant negative impact on the practitioner.            

            While the consequences of a liability settlement on other professionals (lawyers, accountants, etc.) are not as draconian as on healthcare professionals, they still may be substantial.  Such settlements, whether of a suit or a claim, should (must) be disclosed to potential employers and insurers.  This albatross will follow the professional throughout her/his career. 

            Many professional liability policies are “self-reducing”; i.e. defense costs are included in, rather than above and beyond, policy limits.  Such a policy adds another wrinkle to mediation.  In a high value case, in which demand is at or above policy limits, by not settling, thus requiring the defense to continue to incur legal fees and costs, plaintiff must be cognizant that the funds being spent going forward reduce the amount available for settlement.  In other words, he/she is spending “his/her own money.”


            Awareness and consideration of these factors going into the mediation of a professional liability claim or suit will increase the prospects for a successful resolution.

Written by Roger Hillman, Of Counsel at Paramount Law Group, PLLC.  Contact Roger at paramountlawgroup.com for more information. 






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Income Loss due to Actions of Civil Authority- Article by Roger Hillman

Coverage for income loss, also referred to as business interruption insurance, is commonly found in Commercial Property and Business Owner's policies. This provides coverage for loss of income as a result of the insured's suspension of operations. The most frequent triggering event for such coverage is physical damage to the business premises due to a covered peril such as fire or water damage, necessitating a closure for repair, rebuilding, or even relocation. However, one unique aspect of business interruption coverage is income loss due to actions of civil authority. Such actions include something as minor as a road closure for repairs which access to a business or a significant as an order for closure of business in a larger area due to act of terrorism. In order to invoke such coverage, the cause, absent physical damage to the insured premises itself, must be the result of physical loss or damage to property away from the insured property as a result of a...
Read more

2017 Tax Act - Article by Chris Jacob

At the end of 2017, Congress passed and President Donald Trump signed what is now Public law no. 115-97, the 2017 “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” ("the Act").   The Act has several immediate and long-term effects on general aviation tax issues that aircraft owners should note.   Elimination of Section 1031 Exchanges for Personal Property First, the Act eliminates like-kind exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code for all personal property, including aircraft, beginning in 2018.   For those taxpayers who properly initiated 1031 exchanges prior to December 31, 2017 by acquiring a replacement aircraft or selling a relinquished aircraft, the benefits of a 1031 exchange will remain available subject to the previously applicable rules to allow the taxpayers to consummate the full tax-deferred exchange.    All other aircraft owners will be henceforth subject to recapture for any taxable gain.   Thus, owners with fully tax-depreciated aircraft in p...
Read more

Pilots who log Flight Time they did not fly may have effectively ended their Aviation Career

Many of us know, logging hours you did not fly is considered falsification of records by the FAA and is penalized with a revocation of all held certificates for up to one year.   What isn’t as widely known is, such a pilot may be permanently banned from ever holding an Airline Transport Pilot Certificate. For aspiring commercial pilots, the time between receiving a commercial pilot’s certificate (a minimum of 250 hours) and the time when a pilot builds sufficient flight hours to be hired as a pilot making much more than minimum wage, (about 1000 - 2000 hours) can be a difficult time.   It generally takes such pilots years to build this time.   During this time, these pilots are generally building time as a flight instructor or flying introductory or scenic flights – generally low paying jobs.   The desire to build time quickly is understandable. It is a common story - a young, aspiring, impatient pilot at some point gets the urge to add a few hours to their log...
Read more